“This Jungian Life” podcast: Our Attitude toward Death

A mandala at Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland. Source: Marcobeltrametti. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

As a medical social worker in a trauma unit, I was frequently in situations where a family was being informed that their loved one had passed away or was passing away. I witnessed an extraordinary spectrum of ways that people had — or had not — developed a relationship with the archetype of death.

For the most part in American culture, it seems that we are so defended against the certitude of death, so frightened by the cessation of life, that we are often philosophically unprepared to imagine who we would need to be in order to gracefully slip into the hands of the death mother when the time is just right, to welcome the mercy of being liberated from our suffering. We make it more difficult, more painful, more frightening, more alien than perhaps it would need to be.

Certainly, we deprive ourselves of the elegant religious aesthetic that more ancient cultures had been able to cultivate. This was due in part because, lacking the technology we have in the modern age, they could not forestall death. Therefore, developing an attitude of acceptance of death was essential.

But also it seems that death was considered an intrinsic and essential part of life. Part of the religious shaping around death was the certitude that the ancestors continued to be in intimate relationship with their progeny, facilitating, protecting, helping, nurturing. The way we have adopted a scientific attitude in the modern era has deprived us of some of the essential aesthetic that the ancient world had around death.

Of course, embracing science and a scientific attitude has given us a great amount of benefits, but when facing existential realities like death, we have actually been deprived of the help we might have had. We insist on consciousness as the sole reality, we insist on cognition, we insist on science. But by its very nature, death is beyond our ability to think through or cognize.

This is where the realities of the unconscious can come into play, where we turn to mythology, we turn to images from religion, we turn to dreams, we turn to psychic life. But in our modern day world we tend to be so concrete, and so insistent on consciousness as the arbiter of reality, it makes something like death very foreign and alien.

from Stewart, D., Marchiano, L., & Lee, J. (2022, June 10). Episode 217 – Death: A Jungian perspective. This Jungian Life.

Without an understanding of myth, without an understanding of the relationship between destruction and creation, death and rebirth, the individual suffers the mysteries of life as meaningless mayhem alone.

Marion Woodman

Jonathan Haidt on the Impact of “Enhanced Virality” of Social Media

The Tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1-9), Doré’s English Bible, 1866. Gustave Doré.

A democracy cannot survive if its public squares are places where people fear speaking up and where no stable consensus can be reached. Social media’s empowerment of the far left, the far right, domestic trolls, and foreign agents is creating a system that looks less like democracy and more like rule by the most aggressive.

from Haidt, J. (2022, April 11). Why the past 10 years of American life have been uniquely stupid. The Atlantic.

S. Montana Katz on Field Theory and Context in Psychoanalysis

Multiple Views by Stuart Davis, 1918. Oil on canvas. National Gallery of Art, United States.

A critical concept for psychoanalysis, and for field theories in particular in this regard, is to understand the idea of context as multiply indexical. This means that a context is to be understood not only as a process, but as a process with variable components that are ever changing. To say that something is indexical is to say that there are many dimensions along which a context may vary.

A simple example of a sentence with indices is “I am here now.” This sentence has three indices: I, here, and now. There are three dimensions along which the context described by this sentence can change, in part: the speaker, the place, and the time. A constellation that includes a [parent] and an infant will include many more than three indices. Any real-life situation, including a therapeutic process between analyst and analysand, could hold a potentially infinite number of indices.

from Katz, S. M. (2016). Contemporary psychoanalytic field theory: Stories, dreams, and metaphor. Routledge.