MiNa Chung on Social Justice and Gadamer’s “Fusion of Horizons”

Snagov Monastery, Romania. “The Presentation” Church [Entrance of the Theotokos into the Temple], by fusion-of-horizons. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

…[Hans-Georg] Gadamer’s (1975, 1976) philosophical hermeneutics may offer some solutions to the problems with the social justice movement.

For Gadamer, how we come to understand the present necessarily includes an understanding of the past. And when we engage in a Gadamerian “genuine conversation” or dialogue in good faith, we create a hermeneutical situation that makes it possible to experience a moment of what Gadamer called the “fusion of horizons.”

The concept of “horizon” suggests itself because it expresses the superior breadth of vision that the person who is trying to understand must have. To acquire a horizon means that one learns to look beyond what is close at hand — not in order to look away from it but to see it better, within a larger whole and in truer proportion.

Gadamer, 1975, p. 305

Here, Gadamer is not suggesting that “to see it better” means to discover a fixed or essential truth. But rather, seeing it better suggests an active process of understanding the context of “pre-judgments” or prejudice. For Gadamer, prejudice is inescapable. It is situated in the historical horizon, and it is only through dialogue, which reveals aspects of the historical horizon, that we can contextualize prejudice and thereby understand them — theirs and ours — more clearly.

So, in hermeneutical dialogue, the perspective of the other is not solely attributed to that individual as if they exist in a vacuum; instead, the other’s perspective becomes known upon understanding the broader context of that perspective. As the other’s context becomes more understandable, one can experience a truer understanding of the other, and crucially that process can then lead to a truer understanding of one’s own prejudices. This becomes a search for humble understanding, not a demand for purity. [emphasis mine —Matt Sholler]

Dialogue, then, enables a discovery of the good prejudices as well as the bad ones in both dialogical partners. Further, this back-and-forth exchange of horizons helps to create conditions for new understandings; and this enables new possibilities for establishing shared and shifted horizons that can lead to change and transformation.

— from Chung, M. (2021). Are We Woke Yet? Hermeneutics and the Politics of 21st-Century Social Justice. In P. Cushman (Ed.), Hermeneutic Approaches to Interpretive Research: Dissertations in a Different Key (pp. 191–213). Taylor & Francis Limited.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (J. Wiensheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.) New York: Seabury Press (Original work published 1960).

Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Steven Reisner on the Narcissistic Response to Trauma

Narcissus, by Caravaggio (1594-96). Oil on canvas.

To continue to be heard, the traumatized must tell the story that the listeners—the journalists, the philanthropists, the aid organizations, the politicians, and, too often, the therapists—want to hear. When they do so, they are valued; their story is validated. The Tibetan monk, the Kosovar proponent of multiethnic harmony, the Afghan woman under the Taliban, the adult abused as a child, each tells a story of suffering which at different times has satisfied the [narcissistic] fantasy (not to mention the political agenda) of different listeners. It is the story that becomes the commodity; it is the story, not the suffering, that is validated in the telling.

Herein lies the envy that sets in among sufferers; true sufferers believe that it is suffering itself that opens privileged status, and they become confused when the listener moves on to another story of suffering, equal (or lesser) in severity compared to the first, but that holds more current meaning for the listener.

from Reisner, S. (2003). Trauma: the seductive hypothesis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51(2), 381–414.

The Pain of Participation

…the pain of participating in this world while questioning it is much more preferable to the pain of denial, dissociation, and withdrawal. The challenge is not to be defeated when we are confused and afraid —we must be free to think.

Lord, S. P. (2014). Ways of Being in Trauma-Based Society: Discovering the Politics and Moral Culture of the Trauma Industry Through Hermeneutic Interpretation of Evidence-Supported PTSD Treatment Manuals (P. Cushman (ed.)) [PsyD, Antioch University – Seattle].